22. Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology.

Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Sample Answer 1

Band 8.5

The debate over the freedom of university students to choose their field of study versus the necessity to study subjects that are deemed useful for the future, such as science and technology, is a contentious one.

On one hand, proponents of unrestricted choice argue that university is a time for intellectual exploration and personal growth. They believe that students should be allowed to pursue their passions, as this will lead to greater motivation and engagement in their studies. This approach could potentially lead to innovative breakthroughs in less traditional or less 'useful' fields, as passionate students push the boundaries of knowledge in their chosen area.

On the other hand, those who advocate for a more directed approach to education argue that certain fields of study, particularly those related to science and technology, are more likely to lead to job opportunities and economic stability in the future. They contend that by focusing on these areas, universities can better prepare students for the demands of the modern job market and contribute to the advancement of society in these critical sectors.

While both viewpoints have merit, I believe a balanced approach is necessary. Universities should indeed offer a wide range of subjects for students to choose from, allowing them to explore their interests and passions. However, they should also provide guidance and resources to help students understand the potential career paths and societal needs associated with different fields of study. This way, students can make informed decisions about their education, balancing their personal interests with the practical considerations of their future careers and contributions to society.

In conclusion, while the freedom to study whatever one likes can lead to personal fulfillment and potential innovation, a focus on 'useful' subjects related to science and technology can ensure economic stability and societal advancement. A balanced approach, which allows for personal choice while providing guidance on future implications, seems to be the most beneficial for both the individual and society.

Difficult Words/Phrases with Example Sentences:

Word: Contentious

(Meaning already provided)

Word: Unrestricted

Meaning: Not limited or controlled in any way.

Example sentence: Universities are often seen as places of unrestricted intellectual exploration.

Word: Breakthrough

Meaning: A significant advance or discovery.

Example sentence: Some believe that breakthroughs in art and literature are just as important as those in science and technology.

Word: Advocate

Meaning: To publicly support or recommend something.

Example sentence: Many organizations advocate for increased funding for scientific research.

Word: Merits

Meaning: The good qualities or advantages of something.

Example sentence: Both sides of the argument have their own merits.

Word: Potential

Meaning: Existing in possibility; likely to happen in the future.

Example sentence: The potential benefits of studying a less traditional field are often overlooked.

Word: Implications

Meaning: The likely or possible consequences of something.

Example sentence: Students should be aware of the implications of their choice of study for their future careers.

22. Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology.

Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Sample Answer 2

Band 8.5

                   The debate over whether college students should be allowed to major in whatever they want or forced to focus on practical fields of study has emerged. This essay will examine both perspectives and offer my own judgement on the subject.
According to proponents of unrestricted choice, allowing students to study subjects of their choosing fosters individuality, creativity, and enthusiasm for education. According to them, students perform best when they are authentically interested in the subject matter. In addition, unrestricted choice permits students to explore diverse disciplines, acquire a well-rounded education, and discover their true talents and passions.

On the other hand, proponents of a focus on practical and future-oriented subjects argue that scarce resources should be allocated to fields that have a direct impact on society and the job market. They contend that encouraging students to pursue science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) fields can address skill gaps, improve employability, and contribute to national development. They stress the significance of aligning education with labour market requirements.

A balanced approach is essential, in my opinion. In addition to allowing students to choose their courses based on their interests and aspirations, universities should provide guidance and resources to ensure a well-rounded education. Students can make informed decisions about their academic pursuits if they are encouraged to engage in interdisciplinary learning and provided with career guidance.

In addition, universities can implement flexible curricula that enable students to select a combination of courses that correspond to their interests and future objectives. This approach would establish a balance between individual choice and the acquisition of necessary skills and knowledge.

In conclusion, despite the fact that the freedom to choose university subjects fosters individuality and a passion for learning, practical considerations should not be neglected. Students can receive a well-rounded education and improve their future prospects through a balanced approach that combines personal interests with the development of marketable skills.

Difficult Words/Phrases with Example Sentences:

Word: Emerged

Meaning: Come into existence or view.

Example sentence: The debate over college majors has emerged in recent years as job trends have shifted.

Word: Fosters

Meaning: Encourages or helps the development of something.

Example sentence: Universities strive to create environments that foster creativity and critical thinking.

Word: Enthusiasm

Meaning: Strong positive feeling about something.

Example sentence: Their genuine enthusiasm for the subject was evident in their class participation.

Word: Scarce

Meaning: Not enough of something for everyone who needs it.

Example sentence: Funding for the arts is often scarce, making it difficult for many programs to thrive.

Word: Employability

Meaning: The ability to get a job.

Example sentence: STEM degrees are typically associated with high employability rates.

Word: Interdisciplinary

Meaning: Involving the study of several different subjects at the same time.

Example sentence: Many colleges are offering more interdisciplinary programs to meet the demands of the modern workforce.

Word: Curriculum

Meaning: The course of study offered by a school or university.

Example sentence: A flexible curriculum allows students to tailor their education to their individual needs.

Word: Marketable

Meaning: Able to be easily sold or advertised.

Example sentence: Developing marketable skills can increase your chances of landing a good job.

22. Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology.

Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Sample Answer 3

Band 8

Certainly, the evolution of university curricula is a topic of considerable significance, and the debate between studying subjects based on personal interest versus focusing solely on career relevance is a complex one. Let's delve into the arguments on both sides.

Opting for a curriculum aligned with students' interests offers several advantages. The primary benefit is enhanced engagement and understanding. When students are passionate about the subjects they study, they are more likely to invest time and effort in comprehending complex concepts. The survey from the Times of India underscores this point, indicating that a majority of students prefer attending lectures on their favorite subjects, leading to improved academic performance.

Furthermore, a curriculum tailored to individual interests fosters a love for learning. It encourages students to explore and deepen their knowledge in areas they find intriguing. This not only contributes to their intellectual growth but also lays the foundation for a lifelong commitment to continuous learning. In a rapidly changing world, adaptability and a zest for learning are crucial attributes for success.

However, the argument in favor of emphasizing science and technology in university curricula is equally compelling. The contemporary job market places a premium on skills and knowledge in these fields. Increasing the capacity for admission in science and technology programs responds to the growing demand for professionals in these domains. Providing additional resources for personality development and industrial training further enhances the employability of graduates, aligning their skills with industry requirements.

In conclusion, a balanced approach to university curricula seems prudent. While considering students' interests is vital for their overall satisfaction and engagement, acknowledging the practical needs of the job market, especially in science and technology, is crucial. A nuanced blend that allows for personal growth and career relevance can pave the way for well-rounded and successful graduates.

22. Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology.

Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Sample Answer 4

Band 8.5

Absolutely, the choice of subjects in education holds significant implications for an individual's growth and development. While there are merits to allowing students to choose subjects based on their interests, there are also arguments in favor of a more focused curriculum emphasizing science and technology.

Opting for a curriculum that aligns with an individual's interests and preferences can yield several advantages. Firstly, it addresses the diversity of talents and inclinations among students, allowing them to excel in areas that genuinely captivate their curiosity. This approach acknowledges the importance of a holistic education that goes beyond traditional academic subjects. Moreover, it fosters a sense of enthusiasm for learning, potentially resulting in higher academic performance and a deeper understanding of chosen subjects.

Furthermore, a personalized curriculum contributes to the overall well-being of students. By engaging with subjects they find interesting, individuals are more likely to develop a passion for continuous learning, positively impacting their mental and emotional health. This approach recognizes that a well-rounded education encompasses various disciplines, including arts, humanities, and vocational studies, all of which play crucial roles in personal and societal development.

On the contrary, proponents of a focus on science and technology argue for the practical benefits these fields bring to the future. The rapid advancements in technology and the increasing importance of scientific knowledge in various industries underscore the relevance of a strong foundation in science-based subjects. For instance, innovations like vertical farming demonstrate the practical applications of scientific knowledge in addressing global challenges such as food production and sustainability.

In conclusion, the debate around subject choices in education reflects the tension between personalized growth and societal demands for scientific and technological proficiency. While individual interests are crucial, there is also a compelling case for prioritizing subjects that prepare students for the evolving landscape of the future, emphasizing a balanced and nuanced approach to education.

22. Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology.

Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Sample Answer 5

Band 8

Absolutely, the choice of subjects in formal education is a pivotal decision that can significantly impact an individual's academic journey and future career prospects. Let's explore the arguments for both sides of this contentious issue.

Opting for subjects that genuinely interest students has multifaceted advantages. Firstly, it fosters a genuine love for learning. When individuals study subjects they are passionate about, the learning experience becomes inherently enjoyable, leading to sustained curiosity and exploration. The survey results, indicating an increasing number of successful individuals attributing their achievements to pursuing their interests, underscore the importance of aligning education with personal passion.

Moreover, choosing subjects based on individual interest can contribute to mental well-being. Students who engage with subjects they enjoy are likely to experience lower levels of stress and burnout, leading to a more positive overall learning experience. Mental health is a critical aspect of academic success and personal growth.

However, the counterargument emphasizes the pragmatic approach of selecting subjects with more apparent career options, particularly in fields like Mathematics, Physics, and IT. In the contemporary job market, these areas often offer lucrative opportunities and high demand. As technology continues to play a pivotal role in various industries, skills in these subjects become increasingly valuable.

Balancing these perspectives is crucial. While pursuing one's interests can lead to a fulfilling academic journey, it's essential to consider the practical aspects of employability and future career prospects. A well-rounded approach that combines personal passion with an awareness of market demands can pave the way for a successful and satisfying educational experience.

In conclusion, the ideal approach lies in finding a harmonious balance between personal interests and practical considerations, ensuring that education becomes a fulfilling and purposeful journey that prepares individuals for both personal satisfaction and professional success.

22. Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology.

Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Sample Answer 6

Band 8

Absolutely, the debate around students' choice of subjects is multifaceted, with compelling reasons on both sides. Let's delve deeper into the arguments for and against studying topics of personal interest versus courses like science and technology.

Choosing subjects aligned with personal interests indeed presents several advantages. The passion and genuine curiosity students feel for their favorite topics often translate into better academic performance. When students are engaged in subjects they love, the learning process becomes more enjoyable, leading to increased motivation and a higher likelihood of success.

Moreover, studying one's interests contributes to holistic development. In-depth knowledge in a specific field fosters not only intellectual growth but also emotional and social well-being. Students are more likely to develop a sense of purpose and satisfaction when pursuing subjects that resonate with their passions.

However, the counterargument emphasizes the practicality of opting for science and technology courses. In today's rapidly evolving world, technological advancements play a crucial role in various industries. Skills acquired in science and technology fields are often in high demand, opening up diverse and lucrative career opportunities. Furthermore, proficiency in these areas can contribute to national economic growth and global innovation.

Your perspective aligns with the idea that students should prioritize their interests. The motivation and focus derived from studying what one loves can positively impact mental health. A balance between personal passion and the practical skills demanded by the job market is crucial for a well-rounded education.

In conclusion, while pursuing one's interests can enhance motivation and well-being, recognizing the value of science and technology in contemporary society is equally important. A balanced approach that combines personal passion with an awareness of market demands ensures that education serves both personal fulfillment and future career success.